Electropathy Graduate Dies During Dharna: A Reminder of Longstanding Struggles

Source: Times of India

Introduction

On September 5, 2001, the Electropathy community witnessed a tragic loss when a graduate passed away while participating in a dharna (protest). The protest was part of a long struggle following the de-recognition of Electropathy courses in 1994, which left thousands of students and practitioners uncertain about their future.

Background of the Issue

Electropathy, also known as Electrohomeopathy, has been practiced in India for decades as a natural and affordable system of healing. However, in 1994, courses in this discipline were officially de-recognised, creating a deep crisis for students who had already completed or were pursuing their education in the field.

• Students’ Plight: Many graduates suddenly found their degrees questioned, leaving them unable to practice or find legitimate recognition.

• Practitioners’ Struggle: Those already in practice faced harassment and legal hurdles due to unclear regulations.

• Community Response: Since then, practitioners and students have organized repeated protests, demanding fair recognition and restoration of their educational courses.

The 2001 Dharna and Tragic Death

The protest in September 2001 was one among several demonstrations aimed at drawing the government’s attention to the plight of Electropathy graduates. Unfortunately, during the dharna, one graduate lost his life—a tragedy that became symbolic of the community’s long-standing suffering and neglect.

Impact on the Movement

The incident intensified calls for justice and recognition:

• Awareness Raised: The tragedy brought national attention to the Electropathy community’s grievances.

• Unity Among Practitioners: Associations and practitioners came together with renewed determination.

• Policy Demands: Appeals for re-recognition of courses, fair regulation, and protection of practitioners gained strength.

Conclusion

The death of an Electropathy graduate during the 2001 dharna remains a painful chapter in the history of natural healing movements in India. It serves as a reminder of the urgent need for clear policies, recognition, and respect for alternative systems of medicine. Honoring such sacrifices means ensuring that no future student or practitioner is left in uncertainty due to regulatory neglect.